E 'was granted the appeal by the TAR Legambiente Fumane Futura Association and Valpolicella 2000 against the authorization issued by the Province Cement Fumane.
Stop the use of waste and stop the project of modernization.
Great news for all the Valpolicella and thanks to the many friends always sympathetic to the occasion. Of course not ended the way for a different future in the valley.
REG.PROV.COLL No. 00360/2011.
REG.RIC No. 02462/2009.
ITALIAN REPUBLIC ON BEHALF OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE
The Regional Administrative Court of Veneto
(Section Three)
gives the following
Judgement on the appeal to General Ledger number 2462 of 2009 , supplemented by additional grounds, proposed by:
Legambiente Onlus Association National Association of Valpolicella 2000, the Association Committee Fumane Futura, Fulvio Scamperle, Scamperle Franco, Anna Chiara Scamperle, Scarlett Scamperle, Joseph Conchi, Tiziano Faccioli, Roberto Marchesini, represented and defended by the lawyer. Maurizio Sartori Antonio Sartori, with an address at the office of second in Venice-Mestre, Calle del Sale, 33;
Legambiente Onlus Association National Association of Valpolicella 2000, the Association Committee Fumane Futura, Fulvio Scamperle, Scamperle Franco, Anna Chiara Scamperle, Scarlett Scamperle, Joseph Conchi, Tiziano Faccioli, Roberto Marchesini, represented and defended by the lawyer. Maurizio Sartori Antonio Sartori, with an address at the office of second in Venice-Mestre, Calle del Sale, 33;
against
Province of Verona, in the person of the President pro tempore, represented and defended by the lawyer. Luigi Carponi Schitt, Marta Dal Bosco, with an address at Luigi Schitt fours in Venice-Mestre, via Filiasi, 57;
City Fumane , in the person of the mayor pro tempore, not on the merits,
City Marano di Valpolicella , in the person of the mayor pro tempore, not in court;
City Fumane , in the person of the mayor pro tempore, not on the merits,
City Marano di Valpolicella , in the person of the mayor pro tempore, not in court;
against
Industry Cementi Giovanni Rossi S.p.A. , in persona del legale rappresentante pro tempore, rappresentata e difesa dagli avv. Annamaria Tassetto, Franco Zambelli, con domicilio eletto presso Franco Zambelli in Venezia-Mestre, via Cavallotti, 22;
per l'annullamento
della delibera n. 153 del 6/8/2009 della Giunta Provinciale, avente ad oggetto il giudizio di compatibilità ambientale sul progetto relativo al progetto di ammodernamento della cementeria di Fumane presentato dalla ditta Industria Cementi Giovanni Rossi S.p.A. di Piacenza, ai sensi dell'art. 4 c. 3 della L.R. 26/3/1999 n. 10 e s.m.;
della delibera n. 159 del 20/8/2009 della Giunta Provincial, concerning the assessment of the environmental project to reduce consumption of natural raw materials in the production process through the use of non-hazardous waste at the plant located in City of Industry Cement Company Fumane by John Rossi SpA pursuant to Article . 26 d: lgs. 04/03/2006 No 152;
determining executive n. 4787 1 / 9 / 2009 of the Province of Verona, which enables the company to John Rossi Cement Industry project implementation and operation of the recovery of waste with prescriptions;
Minute No 222 of 05/15/2009 of the Provincial EIA
Minute No 206 of 28/11/2008 of the Provincial EIA
Minute No 227 of 26/06/2009 of the Provincial Integrated VIA;
of the minutes of Conference Services of 27/5/2009.
As additional grounds for determining n. 1482/2010 of 19.3.2010 concerning the Integrated Environmental Authorisation.
In view of the action, the additional grounds and its annexes;
In view of appearance in court of the Province of Verona and Industry Cement John Rossi SpA;
view of the briefs, all
Visas acts of the case;
Relatore nell'udienza pubblica del giorno 11 novembre 2010 il dott. Elvio Antonelli e uditi per le parti i difensori Antonio Sartori per la parte ricorrente, G. Biondaro, su delega di Carponi Schittar per la Provincia di Verona e F. Zambelli per la controinteressata Industria Cementi Giovanni Rossi spa;
Ritenuto e considerato in fatto e diritto quanto segue.
FATTO
I ricorrenti premettono in fatto che proprio nel cuore della Valpolicella, precisamente nel Comune di Fumane, l’Industria Cementi Rossi S.P.A abbia dato avvio a due parallele operazioni volte, l’una, ad un asserito ammodernamento di un cementificio già in attività nella zona; l’altra finalizzata to reduce consumption of natural raw materials in cement production process, to be implemented through the use of non-hazardous waste in place of the said commodities. More precisely
on 6.5.2008 the company filed an initial application Cement Industry and annexes of the final draft and environmental impact assessment (SIA) to "reduce consumption of natural raw materials in the production process through the use of non-hazardous waste "at the plant in the town of Fumane order to obtain the Environmental Impact Assessment.
With a second request dated 22.7.2008 called for the trial of the same environmental compatibility in the above question, since the project on the management of waste, were also issued the approval of the project according to Art. 208 of Legislative Decree 152/06 (approved only for new disposal facilities and waste collection) and LR No 3 of 2000 (rules on waste management). The Commission
VIA Minutes # 190 of 26.6.2008 entrusted the investigation to the working group rapporteurs arch. Frapporti, arch. Mazzon and Eng. Residori.
Minutes With No 198 dated 18.9.2008, the Commission held the request of provincial EIA documentation.
On 23.1.2009 the company Cement Industry John Rossi, being in possession of an environmental Provisional obtained by Decree 24. Veneto Region, 4.9.2007, has submitted to the province a third application for release of the Integrated Environmental (AIA) final, pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 59/05.
On 4.2.2009 the Province informed the initiation of the AIA procedure, indicating that the process of Integrated Environmental Permit would be integrated into the EIA procedure.
On February 9, 2009 Provincial Committee met the integrated VIA (acting as conference services) for the approval of the preliminary investigation AIA.
During the proceedings on the AIA held its first conference services on 16.4.2009.
On 05.27.2009 was held the final conference of the Services, in proceedings relating to AIA.
On 26.6.2009 the Provincial Commission for EIA, Integrated pursuant to art. 23 LR 10/99 with the representative of the City of Fumane, gave a favorable opinion approving the project subject to provisions contained in the report and opinion of the proposed investigation of 26/06/2009.
On 20.8.2009 the provincial government has decided to formulate "favorable opinion of the environmental project to reduce consumption of natural raw materials in the production process through the use of non-hazardous waste with prescrizioni di cui al verbale n. 206 del 28 novembre 2008 della C0mmissione di VIA.
Con determina 4787/09 in data 1.9.2009, il dirigente del settore Ambiente della provincia di Verona, prendendo atto del parere favorevole della delibera di Giunta Provinciale n. 159 con prescrizioni e del parere n. 227 del 26.6.2009 approva ai sensi dell’art. 23 della L.R. n. 10/99 il progetto presentato e rilascia l’Autorizzazione Integrata Ambientale per quanto attiene la relazione dell’impianto di recupero rifiuti.
Parallelamente e contestualmente alla procedura per l’utilizzo dei rifiuti, l’Industria Cementi ha attivato una seconda procedura volta ad ottenere la VIA per l’ammodernamento dello stesso cementificio.
On 13.5.2008 the Cement Industry in the Province of Verona filed an application with the attached draft.
The substance of modernization concerns the replacement of furnaces and mills Lepol reduction of raw materials with a new kiln with cyclonic preheater tower (cyclones) integrated with the grinding mill in a single line.
aspects concerning modernization are also highlighted in the reports of the ARPA June 13, 2008 in which, while expressing support for environmental improvements resulting from new technology highlights the landscape impact of erectile artifacts.
By resolution of the City Council No 20, 26 June 2008 the municipality of Marano di Valpolicella, involved in the EIA procedure adopted in conjunction with the City of Fumane the document "Application for an environmental impact assessment of the modernization project of cements Fumane, D. Decree 152/2006 and subsequent amendments Observations of common Fumane and Marano di Valpolicella.
By resolution of the City Council No 32, July 2, 2008 the City of Fumane as Board Member to issue permission to build on the final draft, approved the Annex 5 to the same resolution.
The document approved by the municipalities of Marano and Fumane was acquired in the course of investigating the EIA as an observer of the municipalities involved, representing aspects of a document landscape of the area affected by the cement plant.
On 9/3/2009 John Rossi, the company informed the Cement Industry will conduct a review of the design originally submitted, the design review with the cement industry has sought ways to mitigate the landscape impact of eye-catching new design, even in Consistent with comments received from the Municipalities concerned.
With Decision No. 35 of 20.9.2009 of the City Fumane took note of a feasibility study presented by Rossi cements containing six alternative proposals as possible solutions for the road suffers from traffic to and from the cement plant.
On 15.5.2009 a report of No 222 la Commissione Provinciale VIA, pur considerate le risultanze istruttorie negative del gruppo di lavoro istruttorio, esprimeva parere favorevole con prescrizioni ai fini della compatibilità paesaggistica, imponendo l’acquisizione del parere favorevole della Soprintendenza, la realizzazione a carico del proponente di opere strutturali asseritamene approvate dal Consiglio comunale di Fumane con delibera n. 35 del 20.9.2008, oltre all’acquisizione anche dell’Autorizzazione Integrata Ambientale.
A sostegno del ricorso vengono dedotti i seguenti motivi:
Quanto alla procedura sull’ammodernamento dell’impianto:
1)eccesso di potere illogicità ed intrinseca contraddittorietà del provvedimento, violazione dell’art. 6, lett. e) L. 241/90, violazione della L.R. n. 10/99, in particolare degli art. 1 e 2.
Viene rilevato che l’autorità deliberante si è discostata dai risultati dell’istruttoria senza motivare in modo adeguato la propria decisione difforme dalla stessa.
2)difetto di motivazione, violazione della L.R. n. 10/99, in particolare dell’art. 1.
Viene rilevato che l’unica motivazione rinvendibile nei provvedimenti impugnati risulta essere quella negativa espressa dal gruppo di lavoro ed allegata al verbale n. 222 del 15.5.2009 della Commissione provinciale VIA, a propria volta richiamato nella deliberazione di Giunta provinciale n. 153/09.
Si rileva al riguardo che l’art. 1 della L.R. n. 10/99 indica le finalità e quindi la ratio della disciplina VIA.
3)eccesso di potere per erroneità e/o falsa rappresentazione dei presupposti, difetto di istruttoria e motivazione.
Viene rilevato che il progetto revisionato presenta delle condizioni addirittura peggiorative di quello originario.
4)Difetto di competenza.
Viene rilevato che anche dello scavo delle 95.00 tonnellate di roccia doveva essere investita la Regione, non essendo competente la Provincia a svolgere sullo stesso alcuna valutazione d’impatto ambientale.
5)Eccesso di potere per falsa rappresentazione ovvero erronea rappresentazione dei presupposti, difetto e/o illogicità di istruttoria e di motivazione.
Viene rilevato che la delibera comunale n. 35/2008 non è stata considerata idonea a superare le criticità rilevate in punto di viabilità con ciò concretando una palese contraddizione tra risultanze istruttorie e quanto poi deliberato.
Inoltre viene rilevato che la Commissione ha apposto come condizione la realizzazione di opere infrastrutturali che si suppongono indicate nella citata deliberazione comunale n. 35/2008, la quale però non contiene nulla di tutto ciò.
6)Violazione di legge, art. 26, comma 4, L. 152/2006 Difetto di motivazione.
Viene ritenuto illegittimo che in sede deliberativa, sia per what emerges in its report No 222, 15.5.2009 provincial EIA Commission, both in the resolution of the provincial government No 153/2009, the acquisition of the Integrated Environmental has been provided as a condition of effectiveness of the EIA.
The same would be contrary to a condition precedent to the issuance of environmental impact assessment.
7) Violation of the law, in particular Article. 24 paragraph 5, Legislative Decree 152/2006, lack of motivation. The measures challenged
simply cite the comments received from the applicant associations, without taking any position on them.
8) Violation of Law, in particular Article. 25 D.Lvo 152/2006.
Il provvedimento impugnato è frutto di una procedura di VIA monca in quanto priva del necessario apporto partecipativo della Soprintendenza.
Quanto alle procedure sul progetto di utilizzo dei rifiuti:
9)Eccesso di potere per erronea rappresentazione dei presupposti e difetto di motivazione.
L’industria Cementi ha fornito all’amministrazione dei dati non corrispondenti a verità circa i quantitativi di rifiuti già autorizzati, non mettendo l’amministrazione stessa in grado di compiere una valutazione compiuta e su dati reali.
10)Eccesso di potere, erronea rappresentazione dei presupposti, difetto di istruttoria, inintelligibilità and however illogical reasoning.
The Cement Industry has provided information that led to the Administration misled inquiry on the impact of heavy traffic on the narrow access roads to the cement, plus which bisects the City of Fumane.
11) too much power, misrepresentations of the conditions and lack of inquiry.
is highlighted the lack of investigation in which the administration has incurred in omitting the production of medical findings and statistics since 2000, the period for co-incineration in cement.
12) Excess of power, lack of motivation and / or are illogical reasons.
is highlighted the fallacy of the assumptions on which the Administration is committed separately considering the two projects, on the contrary necessarily interpenetrate.
13) violation of Art. 208, paragraph 7, of Legislative Decree n. 152/06.
is noted that on the authorization of the treatment of waste in the ordinary scheme should proceed to review the compatibility of landscaping, with the intervention of the Superintendent, in relation to the specific bond to protect the Valpolicella, under MD May 23, 1957, applied June 29, 1939 under Law No 1497, at least participating in the conference services referred to in paragraph 3 the same art. 208.
14) Excess of power, lack of motivation and however contradictory reasoning.
detects that the Council resolution was limited to only those of environmental compatibility for the first instance of the EIA and this because if it were also attributable to the procedure laid down in the second instance of approval of the project, formulated under ' art. 208 of Legislative Decree 152/06, there is no reason why the same resolution are missing the many requirements of No report 277, 26.6.2009. Likewise, the management determines
No 4787/09, approve the project, not to mention and recall the requirements set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 the proposal for an opinion in the investigation and then implemented by the Commission under the Integrated VIA Minutes # 277, 26.6.2009.
15) Lack of power, abnormal measure. The minutes of 27/05/2009
Services Conference there can be no reference to a case of AIA finalized the financial year interim period necessary for the conduct of a functional test, such as it is in the determination of management 1.9. 2009.
16) Violation of the Regional Law 3 of 2000, art. 22, paragraph 2, lett. d), no security plan.
The project does not contain a security plan that has procedures to be adopted in the event of a serious incident that extends to the outer perimeter of the plant.
With additional grounds is noted that recently, the Province of Verona, Department of Environment - Environmental protection and enhancement service, with no determination 1482/2010 of 19 March 2010 released the Integrated Environmental Authorisation.
The latter measure is considered illegal for the following reasons:
1) too much power to misrepresentation of the conditions and lack of motivation.
No reason it is proposed the 9 of the original application.
2) Too much power, fault and / or illogical reasons, however, contradictory and illogical inconsistencies results of the investigation and the reasons of the measures so far contested.
No reason it is proposed the 12 of the original application.
3) lack of jurisdiction, abuse of power, lack of motivation.
No reason it is proposed the 13 of the original application.
were made in court the province of Verona Cement Industry Rossi Giovanni SpA which have contested the admissibility of the appeal (and the additional reasons) and have found the substance of the merits.
LAW At the outset should be considered exceptions to inadmissibility raised by the Province of Verona and the defendant company.
Exceptions are to be disregarded.
regard to the exception raised in respect of the National Association Legambiente no doubt that such association in light of its statutory tasks and Article 13 of Law No 8 July 1986 349 (article that expressly includes the association Legambiente among those standing to challenge the measures that affect the environment) and the subsequent Act No 15 May 1997 127 (article 17 paragraph 46) should be considered to challenge the acts in question pending the obvious impact that the same actions on the environment and landscape.
must be regarded as legitimate even local associations "Valpolicella 2000 "and" Committee Fumane Futura "expected their undoubted roots in the Valpolicella area, and their statutory purpose (statutes shows that the two associations are in charge primarily protect and enhance the environment). Aloof then the fact that these associations have participated in the process issue in this case and therefore also for this additional factual profile must be considered their legal standing.
on standing of local associations (which pursue the protection of the environment) to challenge administrative acts that affect the environment in which they are located, the Administrative Court is now Consolidated (compare among all the State Council, the fifth section, April 23, 2007 No 1830).
must also regarded as empowered individuals and the individual, because all applicants have demonstrated in acts of living near the cement factory in issue which must be regarded in this case the requirement of so-called "vicinitas" namely the requirement that the case law considers necessary for the purposes of standing to challenge acts that involve the interests of landscape and environmental value.
It also rejected the further objection of inadmissibility raised by the company cements Rossi as in this case, the evidence, shall not be deducted complaint.
the merits of the appeal is based.
Indeed the modernization project, the municipality of Marano di Valpolicella and Fumane have shown, when participation in the procedure, the value of rural landscape and wine of the Valpolicella, the historical value of the local shrine of Santa Maria Valverde , the archeological research aimed at the nearby temple of Minerva and the Scaliger castle and the very considerable critical elements of the landscape (which would be recovered from all sites of observation) caused by the new tower of the cyclone furnace.
In particular it is noted that among other things "as an industrial tower, the project configuration, it is irremediably alter the landscape and with it the popular meaning of that place "and that" if you lose the connotation that place, it would be distorted, making, with this, an action that interrupts a secular history that oozes from the rocks of the hill and the archaeological finds are still visible today " and that" the work, one of a kind, no similar examples in the entire province of Verona, it does not conform to the architectural characteristics of man-made interventions in Valpolicella. In fact, it does not achieve the hoped-for merger with the nature of the work of man. "
Well even in the face of highlighted's critical then the two communities, so apodictic, express a favorable opinion, although subject to the achievement of significant corrections to the project shortly (movement of the building near the hill Scarin, turning to the southwest of the plan and creation of a scale relief of 20/25 m).
very considerable critical elements also emerge The investigation of the working group of three members appointed within the Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment ; investigation then attached to the minutes of May 15, 2009.
This working group, which evaluated the project to reflect changes sought by the two municipalities, dopo aver chiarito che sul progetto andava comunque acquisita l'autorizzazione della Soprintendenza per i Beni Architettonici e Paesaggistici, ha rilevato che "la principale fonte di pressione è rappresentata dalla nuova torre di cicloni di altezza pari a 103 m e delle infrastrutture ad essa correlate che, nonostante le migliorie nel nuovo progetto, risulterebbero altamente impattanti dal punto di vista paesaggistico" e che "il parziale miglioramento altimetrico della torre a cicloni, così come proposto nel nuovo progetto, risulta insufficiente come misura di mitigazione anche in relazione agli ulteriori impatti sulla matrice geomorfologia-paesaggistica per la necessità dello sbancamento di 95.000 mc. di rocce (da introdurre parzialmente with obvious benefits in the production cycle, partly reused to build a relief that it reduces the visibility of the church of S. Maria Valverde) and subtraction of a wooded area which is not bound to see opportunities compensation works.
In relation to the issue of viability, it is considered that a development of the cement affect the existence problem of heavy goods vehicles crossing of the town of Viale Verona Fumane that occurs along a stretch of road that is along the SP 33 " crayon. " This increase would lead to a worsening of the current situation, including on security, which already creates problems for residents identified with a particularly critical intersection between SP 33 "in Pastel" and SP 33b "of Crocietta." there can be alleviated by appropriate action / compensatory in the documentation of the proposed project. "
Well even in the face of such an investigation highlighting so many critical profiles in terms of landscape, the Provincial Committee of the EIA (but without the presence of two of the three members of the select group), in the absence of any justification in order to reasons why it was thought, however, to overcome these profiles of critical issues from that group, expressed his opinion in favor of the project, simply ask only the successful implementation of road works as they were identified by resolution of the City Council Fumane.
In the opinion of the Board in this case the evidence has made an apparent incongruity between the results of the investigation and the final determination and a definite lack of motivation on the reasons imposed, despite the negative results of the investigation, to perform this project in question.
These contradictory and motivation you need to recognize these shortcomings with regard to the next and final act of the Provincial No 153 of 6 August 2009 with this resolution since we are limited to make his own, uncritically, the Commission's findings.
The place can accommodate the use argument not only in the part relating to the project of modernization but also in part related to appeals of the decision giving authorization to the use of non-hazardous waste (GP Resolution No 159 of 20.08.2009) This is because the modernization project as directed introduction of improved technology of the production cycle itself as a prerequisite of the new process for the utilization of waste.
On the other hand, it is the same defense of the company cements Rossi to concede (in memory) that "the investment of funds by the defendant is finalized occurred and the introduction of better technology available today with clear positive effects on prevention and environmental protection "and that" contrary to the conservation of the compendium in the state contributes to a worsening of the current site around. "For the reasons
outlined above there is, of course, was itself unlawful disability derived (and not lapsed) the consequent managerial and executive determines No. 4787 of 04.09.2009 and the subsequent determination of the Provincial Government of Verona No 1482/10 of 19 March 2010 (appeal with additional grounds) concerning "IPPC". That authorization also was adopted on the assumption della legittimità dei progetti di ammodernamento e di riduzione del consumo di materie prime naturali e pertanto deve ritenersi anch’essa affetta da invalidità derivata..
In forza delle svolte argomentazioni il ricorso e i collegati motivi aggiunti vanno pertanto accolti e per l'effetto va disposto l'annullamento di tutti gli atti con gli stessi impugnati.
Il carattere assorbente delle censure esaminate consente di non esaminare gli ulteriori motivi dedotti.
Sussistono giusti motivi per disporre la compensazione delle spese.
P.Q.M.
Il Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto (Sezione Terza), definitivamente pronunciando sul ricorso, come in epigrafe proposto, accoglie sia il ricorso principale sia i motivi aggiunti e per l’effetto annulla gli atti impugnati.
Spese compensate.
Ordina che la presente sentenza sia eseguita dall'autorità amministrativa.
Così deciso in Venezia nella camera di consiglio del giorno 11 novembre 2010 con l'intervento dei magistrati:
Giuseppe Di Nunzio, Presidente
Elvio Antonelli, Consigliere, Estensore
Marco Morgantini, Primo Referendario
| L'ESTENSORE | IL PRESIDENTE | |
| |
FILED IN OFFICE
01/03/2011 The
THE SECRETARY
(Art. 89, para. 3, no. Proc. Admin.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment